> 30 days ago
‹ chat status


Lockport, IL


Post Reads:
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

3 hours ago
4 days ago
5 days ago
12 days ago
16 days ago
19 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago


Politics & Legal > Results of Obama’s Eligibility Hearing in Georgi

Results of Obama’s Eligibility Hearing in Georgi

Results Of Obama’s Eligibility Hearing

In Georgia

January 26, 2012 By Daniel Noe

barack obama9544 Results Of Obamas Eligibility Hearing In Georgia
Watch the entire proceeding on video here: Video Of Georgia Obama Eligibility Hearing
Today’s proceedings generally were about the Natural Born Citizen
clause of the Constitution, and more specifically about Obama’s
eligibility to be on Georgia’s 2012 Presidential Election state ballot.
Three separate challenges were made to said eligibility, including one
by “birther” rock star Orly Taitz. It is safe to say that history was
made today.
Big shocker: Obama did not even show up today. Guess he was too busy
campaigning in Nevada and Colorado for his re-election bid. Heck, he
didn’t even bother to send his attorney Mr. Michael Jablonski to deliver
the necessary documents to the courthouse. But apparently, a lot of
concerned Americans did show up, as the Atlanta courthouse was crowded.
To recap what has happened with this case during the past few weeks,
Mr. Jablonski has tried very hard to stop this case one way or another.
First he attempted to have the case dismissed, then he said it simply
was not relevant to the president, then he argued that as the law stands
the states do not actually have the power to determine who appears on
their individual ballots (yeah, and the Pope is a Muslim), and finally
said that his client was simply too preoccupied with his
responsibilities as President to give a damn about the case. In short,
he found himself continually having to change the story of his client.
However, the Georgia court rejected every one and all of these excuses. Just yesterday, Mr. Jablonski sent out a letter to the secretary of state in
which he declared that the case was simply not to be heard and that he
and his client would effectively boycott these proceedings. Hours later,
Mr. Brian Kemp, Secretary of the Great State of Georgia, responded by saying that Obama and Jablonski were free to not show up at court but would nevertheless be doing so at their own peril.
Of course, Mr. Kemp is wrong since Obama is the president, right?
Shouldn’t he be above the law? I mean, it is pretty likely that someone
like you or I would get away with behaving like them if we were
subpoenaed to appear in court, right?
Court was in session at 9 am sharp; proceedings began with the judge meeting privately with
all attorneys associated with the case (you know, at least those who
 showed up) for more than twenty minutes. According to various sources,
he told them that since Obama was not present that he would be issuing a
default judgment in their favor; he also initially wanted to end the
case right then and there. However, the attorneys insisted on holding
speedy hearings in which witnesses could testify and evidence would be
entered into the court’s records. The judge honored their request.
Much of the evidence presented in court today was obtained with the
help of several Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Among
evidence entered into the court’s records: Obama’s digital “birth
certificate” placed on the website, his father’s place of
birth (Kenya), a few pages from Obama’s memoir “Dreams From My Father”
in which he mentions that his father’s passport had been revoked (and
subsequently could not leave Kenya”, and Immigration Services documents
about Obama Sr.
Van Irion,
one of the attorneys went into more detail about the Natural Born
Citizen clause of the Constitution, citing the decision reached in the
1875 US Supreme Court Minor vs. Happersett. Using visual aids
and copies of the Court’s decision, Mr. Irion distinguishes the term
“citizen” from “natural born citizen.” It is explained that the 14th
Amendment does not change the meaning of a natural born citizen, and
that any and all lower court verdicts do not conflict with that specific
Supreme Court ruling.
What one should take away from this specific testimony, if not the
proceedings in general, is that a natural born citizen has two parents
who also citizens of the United States at the time of said citizen’s
birth. As Obama Sr. was clearly NOT an American citizen, the case can
clearly be made that our president, constitutionally speaking, is not
eligible to serve as our president.
Among those who testified was a former law enforcement officer, a
state-licensed PI, and an IT/PhotoShop expert. They have concluded that
Obama has likely engaged in social security fraud, that his father is
NOT an American citizen, and that the official birth certificate
released by the Obama Administration in April is fake, beyond a
reasonable doubt.
All evidence and testimony has been officially entered into court
records. This leaves the door open for similar cases pending or future
cases to be brought in other states as well. Also, any appeal (if one is
even possible in this case) would have to be based on evidence
presented by the lawyers in each case. Plaintiff Carl Swenson said in an
e-mail to supporters that both “Van Irion (another plaintiff) and my
lawyer Mark Hatfield made certain that our cases and evidence in these
two cases would be closed so as not to be affiliated, in any way, with
‘Birther’ Orly Taitz.”
What everyone is awaiting now from the judge is an official
publishing of today’s ruling, again a default judgment for the
plaintiffs. Swenson says “we won” and that it is now “time for the rest
of the States to take my lead and duplicate this effort.”
One question every American should be asking themselves now that
these eligbility proceedings in Georgia are over is simply: “who
the hell is this guy?”
Although obvious, it is important to note that not even the slightest
mention of these proceedings will be heard in the mainstream liberal
media. And this is for good reason; they obviously want to protect their
guy Obama. When his administration’s lackeys vocally attacked Fox News
in 2009, viewership of Fox News did not go down; it skyrocketed.
Likewise, if the media tries to attack Orly Taitz, these witnesses, or
anyone else associated with these proceedings, the so-called “birther”
movement will only get stronger.
In short, the “birthers,” who have been ridiculed if not ignored by the media and much of the American public for the past three years, have officially been vindicated today.

A blow by blow of the entire court proceeding was made by Craig Andersen of the The National Patriot. His article is found below. We will be updating this page with a
synopsis of what today’s proceedings mean for the entire Obama
eligibility movement and what results we might see. In the meantime,
read the following blow by blow account:

Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia,
Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO
SHOW as of course, was Obama.
The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.
Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.
The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution
and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point,
if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot
in Georgia.

Read more at: By Craig Andresen.

posted on Jan 27, 2012 4:28 AM ()


The birthers are wackos. For sure.
comment by jondude on Jan 27, 2012 5:58 PM ()

Comment on this article   

899 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]